Noticed the above earlier. All I really have to say is, EPIC FAIL.
At the same time, its trying to protect art and let society have the art. But you see, sometimes a piece has a certain significance to society correct? While what Budgie has said is true, and a perfectly normal reaction, you can't help but feel like she's being a bit greedy. Yes it means that we won't have complete, 100% control of our work once its done, yes this is a big issue, but its more complicated than that. Would you really take the statue of liberty away from the people of the US? Yes the IMAGE of it is property of its creator techincally, but people see it as a piece of the US.

anyway...I'm not really thinkin straight, gonna head off and think up a much more intelligent way of saying this.